18 June 2011

Harvesting gravity #2

Harvesting gravity 2
Please see my initial idea titled “Harvesting Gravity 1” or read below.  Some have scoffed at me saying that with the addition of the extra weight and mass plus the driven load, that now the system requires expending more than twice the amount of energy on the upward side of rotation in order to complete one full rotation and that no energy is actually gained.  Saying to me that it is now required to use even more energy than before it began.  I believe that argument is incorrect, because if you refer to the provided diagram, when the imbalanced pendulum weight and mass is put into motion starting at point “A” for instance, that without any electrical energy applied and the rotor is able to move freely on the rotational shaft, it will drop and swing to a point opposite and slightly less than the initial drop, otherwise point “B”.  Again, if it is allowed to freely move, the unbalanced pendulum attached on the rotor would swing back and forth from one side and then back to the other side, loosing energy from all sources of loss until finally stopping at the lowest position or point “C”.  So in truth, when a pendulum weight is placed in motion from point “A” it will in fact swing, and the only true actual energy added will be that what is required to continue the unbalanced rotor motion from point “B” to beyond point “D” to begin another cycle of an input of gravity.   In other words, by disconnecting the motor electrical propelling power at point “D” and applying power again at point “C” would still be adding extra unnecessary energy and yet still produce rotation with the use of gravity.  It is O.K. to be wrong, and it’s O.K. to be right, but if you happen to be right, nobody believes you.  Thank you so much for reading my idea. 
-Michael Q. Shaw

Harvesting gravity 1
Through my studies of science, I have learned that gravity is in fact, a conservative force.  So, why not utilize this abundant “conservative” force to “conserve” on our electric bills and use it to stretch out and to prolong our Earth’s natural resources that are now dwindling?  Since it seems I cannot get anyone to listen to what I have to share with my prototypes and with the demonstrations of my linear magnetic propulsion inventions and magnetic propulsion motor designs, I want to freely give this design away to anyone with the courage to listen.  So how do you harvest gravity?  You cannot simply build a hydroelectric dam in your backyard or in your home that can harvest from the weight and mass of a large body of water, otherwise referred to as free energy, or can you?  What would you say if I told you that there is truly a way to harvest gravity with many common commercial electrical motors built today?  First, you must determine the size of the rotational motor and its rotational foot-pounds of torque output.  Then, you must know how much rotational foot-pounds of torque that is required to drive the attached load.  Next, you securely affix a pendulum like weight to the driveshaft of the horizontally (Securely, as it will be subject to vibration) mounted motor - Not vertically- a pendulum like weight that has a weight and mass that exceeds the weight of foot-pounds of torque of the driven load by a margin, but that does not exceed the maximum load of the motor being used.  Next, set the motor with a pulse circuit control or simply use a limit switch to turn off the motor with the pendulum like weight at the top most point of rotation and a limit switch to turn the motor on with the pendulum like weight at the bottom most point of rotation.  With this design, if you would please, envision a simple teeter-totter or a see-saw at a child’s park, and recall that it is always the heavy child that does all of the work.  Please note that this will only work for low RPM devices, as the faster the rotation becomes, the less the gravity assist becomes and the more centrifugal force will override this effect.  What you truly have is a motor that harvests gravity on the downhill slope, and turns on and only utilizes electrical current on the uphill slope (be sure to calculate for in-rush current with properly sized heaters), operating on electrical energy for only half of the rotation, utilizing potentially half of the energy than before.  To verify and validate this design, simply use two identical variable speed motors, connect both to identical loads with only one utilizing the counterweighted pendulum and pulse or “off-on” interruption circuit.  Place both motors at the same RPM setting and place a wattmeter on both circuits; what I believe you will see is that the gravity assisted motor does in fact use less energy to operate, it is truly harvesting gravity and the energy consumption is now basically the force required to rotate the difference of the driven load and the ballasted pendulum weight, on only half of the rotation cycle.  If my permanent magnet motor designs cannot help change the world and make this a better place, maybe someone out there that has more resources than this enlisted man does, maybe they will eventually read this and make that change for me, for my children, for everyone.  I believe that the Creator of our world truly gave us everything that we ever needed.  Harvest gravity.  It is free and abundant, and unless you plan on leaving planet earth, it is everywhere - day and night. Thank you for reading this, and I apologize if I did not know that it wasn’t possible, nobody has proven it otherwise.


The GOCE gravity-tracking satellite now has an even better use for life as we know it.
Toss a ball into the air and catch it back in your hand and then tell me that this is not possible. You exert energy only one time to cause the ball to raise up into the air, the fall happens like clockwork with no additional input from you, and we all take this fact for granted every day in our daily lives. So, if you have a rotary machine that takes 5 pounds of rotational force to drive a load and rotate, then all that must be done is to affix a 6, 7 or a 10 pound pendulum to the rotor. Turn the electrical power on at the bottom of rotation and then turn it off at the top of rotation, You honestly would be utilizing gravity to do useable work. The weight of the pendulum will be driving the load on the down portion of rotation, and the electricity to the motor on only the upward portion. Connect this system to a pump that operates 24 hours a day, ta-da!
Place 10 pound weights on each pedal of your bike, even 20 pound weights, I just used duct tape to prove the point, now, isn't it easier to pedal around town? Similar to a pumpjack, similar to a dual connected elevator, less exertion is required. The bicycle is 20 pounds heavier, true, but the pedals still feel the same as before the extra weight was added because the system is still balanced and the extra weight is now available for your use to assist you to pedal the bike on straightaways, uphill or down a hill, counter-balanced to the load. If I could make each pedal weigh as much as do, yes the bike would weigh more than 300 pounds, but you would not ever notice it except when picking it up, peddling it would take minimal effort and all I would have to do is shift my weight on each pedal.
My example of the bicycle is incorrect, you certainly would "feel" as if there were more weight and downward thrust available each time you pedal, you would only be peddling a 20 pound heavier "you". But, if it is in fact true that energy is not gained nor lost, that it only changes form, if you put more energy into a system, shouldn't you should get more out? A single pendulum swing will put out what was put in. Now, how much energy does it take to keep that process going in one direction? How much energy is required to continue in the same direction and to "bump" that pendulum, over the apex of the rotational plane to start again? A lot less than rotating an entire weight and mass +plus the amount that was truly consumed or used in the transaction by loss or friction or driving an affixed load.
What would happen if you built a motor that on the shaft we had rotors that rotated clockwise and then the next one rotated counter clockwise ... What would be the forces that could create anti-gravity or a force field to mimic gravity? The smaller the rotor plates the more effects could be produced.
Already been done, but without the gravity mimicking garbage.
All that they are doing is harvesting the downward force of gravity on the downward portion of a low RPM rotation. As you can already see in the video provided by the PESwiki website, the AOGFG Gravity Motor Prototypes 9 and 10 are visibly driven by a motor with an external power source. Any supposed over-unity is only possible gains from the designs shifting center of gravity, otherwise, from the downward fall of gravity portion of rotation.
The entire purpose for posting these ideas was only to hopefully explain and describe the operation of how an upward curved magnetic propulsion field can in fact be designed and built to actually drive a worthwhile and useable load.
I was told by a very important and helpful attorney, to whom I owe much gratitude, that I have designed and built a “cool toy “. After humiliating myself with a inadequate and faulty comparison to a conventional motor design, I only hope that one person that read this may understand what it was I was actually trying to describe. As I have described with the pendulum, it is a rotatable mass, while with the magnetic propulsion field, motion is not constrained solely to the rolling of a chrome steel ball, motion can be transferred to a central fulcrum, pivot or otherwise a bearing mounted rotor.
I used the example of a ten pound pendulum, you can use a one ounce pendulum, it does not matter, a magnetic propulsion field can be constructed to provide the upward driving force to propel and gravity will always provide the downward force which places the driven element back into the starting position of the curved propelling magnetic propulsion field. If the rotating element weighs ten pounds, or one ounce, it will have the capability to drive any lesser driven load than its own weight utilizing a driving magnetic field with a gravity re-set making it so much more than just a cool toy.
Good luck Andrea Rossi, I hope your Energy catalyzer can transform our world!
“Lift” an object 12 inches, stop, and then open your hand on the ISS, otherwise in space.
Q. How far did the object travel? A. Twelve inches.

“Lift” an object 12 inches, stop, and then open your hand on Earth.
Q. How far did the object travel? A. Twenty-four inches.
You did dot “give” the object that energy. You did not “provide” that downward force, you simply exerted a force against a force. The force exerted by your arm against the downward force of gravity. As that object is lifted upward, yes it gained potential energy. You did not provide it that energy, it gained it by virtue of its elevation.
Loading Comment Box..